How Much Gulden NLG Can My Computer Mine

Stratum+tcp://guldencoin.securepayment.cc:3370 Connect to this mining pool using your Gulden address as the username to 'solo mine' for 98% the block reward. You can use any Scrypt miner:, (Best for AMD GPU's), (Best for AMD GPU's), (NVidia GPU's) • minerd.exe --url=stratum+tcp://guldencoin.securepayment.cc:3370 --userpass=WALLET:ANYTHING • cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://guldencoin.securepayment.cc:3370 -u WALLET -p ANYTHING • bfgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://guldencoin.securepayment.cc:3370 -u WALLET -p ANYTHING • cudaminer.exe -a scrypt -o stratum+tcp://guldencoin.securepayment.cc:3370 -u WALLET -p ANYTHING If you happen to find a block you'll get 98% the reward. The remaining reward is donated to the pool operator. If you just want to donate hashes use anything for the username. Miner stats can be viewed.

Manage your settings. Pool Stats can be viewed.

Create Gulden address with Vanitygen and import. The QRcode of the address so I use my Gulden. And always test first with small ammounts like 1 NLG. Installing the Raspberry Pi + LKETC usb miner itself isn. Internet so that you can connect with the Raspberry from your computer. Do you try to mine Gulden? In comparison to Bitcoin, Gulden (NLG) seems to have much potential for daily use. Namely, it has been designed to be very user-friendly. You can use it on your computer and mobile phone and the currency is easily tradeable for Euros and Bitcoin. Also, the system on which Gulden runs is very safe and fast, even better than Bitcoin's. With this function you can use an account from your Gulden desktop app on your mobile phone. Nocks NLG-EUR Gulden Trader NLG-EUR Bittrex NLG-BTC LiteBit EUR-NLG.

Another altcoin. This one has a 10% pre-mining cut for the founders: 'Zcash's monetary base will be the same as Bitcoin's — 21 million Zcash currency units (ZEC, or ⓩ) will be mined over time. 10% of that reward will be distributed to the stakeholders in the Zcash Company — founders, investors, employees, and advisors. We call this the “Founders Reward”.'

Here's a list of the other 709 altcoins.[1] 373 of them are still tradeable. 88 have a market cap in excess of $1M. 27 have a market cap in excess of $10M. 4 have a market cap in excess of $100M. PayCoin, which was last year's heavily promoted new cool coin with a 'guaranteed floor' of $20, is now at position 415 with a value of $0.002606 and a market cap of $30,247. 'Premined' is not strictly accurate. 1/10 of the mining reward will eventually go toward a wallet controlled by the developers.

The rate of the incentive payments starts out high and decreases over time. [1] This is different from a premine or instamine, where the devs begin life with a stash of protocol tokens, which they then have a strong inclination to dump on the market. Zcash 10% vig is an improvement over instamine or premine. I agree this structure is still not ideal for maximizing zcash value, as it creates an incentive to clone zcash (without the vig). Zcash looks like it will be rather more difficult to clone than, say, Ethereum. But it will certainly be done. I also expect that some of zcash features will be added to other protocols, thus diluting its tech advantage.

No one has figured out how to force everyone to invest in the same version of bitcoin, and perhaps that is as it should be. I still expect the Zcash devs to make out OK. You might be interested in Tezos (, disclosure: I'm the lead dev), an upcoming distributed ledger and smart-contract platform with a decentralized governance model. It's not a clone of Ethereum, it's a fresh, from scratch implementation of a new protocol in pure OCaml (with the notable exception of a dependency on libsodium). It's two year in the making and we're hoping to launch in March.

Governance is necessary for the maintenance of the commons, but we don't think it should be in the hand of a foundation or a core development team. Given how complicated the technology is that they will be working with (as someone who has attempted to read the zcash whitepaper), I find this extremely unlikely. Sure there will be clones, but no altcoin 'developer' will be able to properly maintain this, so bugs won't get fixed, or it'll always be lagging behind Zcash, or worse, they introduce unintentional bugs and completely wreck their blockchain and lose the money of the few fools who thought that the developers/company running it getting some money is bad.

I went to a talk at Stanford by Eran Tromer on Wednesday, in which he described some of the theory behind Zcash. GameCredits GAME Mining Rig For Sale. He made a lot of very strong claims about his new approach to computer security. There was a lot of hand-waving. I don't understand exactly what he's claiming, and what he claims to have proved. You can watch the video yourself and try to figure it out.[1] Tromer's paper [2] may be helpful. At least there, the references are cited and findable.

Tromer's first result deals with collision-resistant hash functions. That's been a big headache in practice. It's really hard to develop a cryptographic hash function for which someone can't create two strings that result in the same hash.[3] MD4 and MD5 have been broken, SHA-1 has been partially broken, and SHA-256 hasn't been (publicly) broken yet. Tromer seems to claiming that he has a solution to weak hash functions. But it's really hard to tell from his writing. Anybody really understand this? I'm Dutch, consider myself well-informed and well-read, but I've never heard of this project before.

To be honest, it sounds like another cryptocoin pyramid scheme. On their website this altcoin is presented as an investment opportunity where the value of the coins you own increases with the number of users. >The value of Gulden is determined by the demand for Gulden, as with gold or silver. The price can go up or down, but on average the value of Gulden goes up. It will only go up. Just like all the other altcoins.

There is something that irks me about the name of this project. Gulden is the name of the Dutch currency used before the introduction of the Euro. At this point in time it has strong historical connotations (obviously), but it is also a symbol of adherents of the nationalistic political (far) right in the Netherlands. There are plenty of people from the lower socio-economic classes who fuelled by demagogues who believe we should revert to the Gulden (the actual currency, not this altcoin), close our borders, get out of the EU and once again prosper (even though we are already doing pretty well all things considered, and the EU benefits us on the whole, despite all its warts). Choosing Gulden as a name for this project seems to explicitly place it at the heart of that particular bit of discontent.

It also feels extremely pretentious to use the name of our historic currency that anyone over the age of twenty actually used. This I can grok from a commercial standpoint, but it leaves a nasty taste.

Apart from you associating wanting back the old Gulden and leaving the EU with being part of a lower-economic class, which it find extremely elitist, condescending and it annoys me greatly. Gulden is used for actual value transfer that is easier than currently possible between banks, I can just transfer value to you by scanning your QR code. As such there is value in this method. Moreover I can not only transfer value to you but also to shop holders and taxi drivers around Groningen, this is due to human labor by the company behind Gulden.

Gulden was trending in the iOS store a couple of days ago by the way, so many people have heard of it, even internationally. The name YouTube also refers to old CRTs, perhaps indeed to evoke a certain feeling. I understand your annoyance about the class statement, but demographically speaking I'm not far off the mark. Appearances aside, marketeers don't choose names at random. There is a thought-through business plan behind this that specifically targets a certain demographic — I contend that a good part of the group targeted here can often ill-afford to invest their savings in something as ethereal as an altcoin (which is what they are suggesting on the Gulden website). >Gulden is used for actual value transfer [] I can see some of the benefits touted, but for most of those situations cash or our excellent system of debit cards and POS-terminals already do this, and transferring money via IBAN is peanuts (and free within most EU countries).

But convenience aside, cash works without a smartphone and middlemen. It's mostly anonymous too. Besides, I get that companies are vying for the position of the one digital money transfer 'app' here in the Netherlands, because whoever manages to do that is in for a very profitable ride (like that one similar app popular in Sweden), but linking it to their own altcoin seems like a way to propagate a pyramid scheme by means of an app some will find useful.